Re: versioning test on AIX

Hello Ralf, there might be a simple solution for this problem on AIX. For example my libltdl.a (from the AIX Toolbox or my own build) contains the following: 32 bit member: libltdl.so.0 <- from the old libtool libltdl.so.3.1.6 ltdl.o 64 bit member: libltdl.so.3.1.6 ltdl.o If an old program

Re: versioning test on AIX

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:30:01AM CEST: > The test tries to ensure that with an incompatible library upgrade, > programs previously linked against the old library still work. This > usually works on systems where different major versions of a library > have different file

Re: versioning test

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:43PM CET: > * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:18:32PM CET: > > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >> Here is a testsuite addition to get so

Re: versioning test

* Mike Gorchak wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:25AM CET: > > RW>> 2) Failure test: > > RW>> does this work on your system? > > RW>> echo 'int not_main () { return 0; }' > a.c > > RW>> qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -c a.c > > RW>> qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 -funroll-all-loo

Re: versioning test

Hi Mike, * Mike Gorchak wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:25AM CET: > > RW>> cd tests/testsuite.dir/16 > > RW>> ./libtool --debug --mode=link --tag=CC qcc -V3.3.5,gcc_ntox86 -O3 > > RW>> \-funroll-all-loops -o libconv.la \1/a.lo > > RW>> 2/a.lo 3/a.lo 4/a.lo 5/a.lo li

Re: versioning test

Hello, Ralf! > RW>> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in > RW>> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a > RW>> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your > RW>> build tree in which you ran the testsuite. Then ente

Re: versioning test

* Mike Gorchak wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:20:56AM CET: > RW> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in > RW> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a > RW> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your > RW> build tree in

Re: versioning test

Hello, Ralf! RW> please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks. Sorry, my fault :) RW> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in RW> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a RW> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your R

Re: versioning test

Hello Mike, please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks. * Mike Gorchak wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:11:30AM CET: > RW> Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning. > RW> OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody > RW> proof-read it so there are no sil

Re: versioning test

Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:18:32PM CET: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning. >> OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody >> proof-read it so there are no silly typos

Re: versioning test (was: Small patch for the QNX platform)

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning. OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody proof-read it so there are no silly typos or thinkos. I read it and did not see any silly typos or thinkos, but then again