On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Tim Rice wrote:
Or maybe it just seems so because those that want a change are those
that will speak up.
I prefer tabs. If I want the text in the 25th column it's just
3 tab keys and start typing. I don't have to count out pressing
the space bar 24 times and then wondering i
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2009-01-21 23:13, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> > * Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:29:52PM CET:
> > > Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > > > For many years I have had my editor configured to always use
> > > > spaces. This ensures WYSIWYG for ever
Den 2009-01-21 23:13, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:29:52PM CET:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
For many years I have had my editor configured to always use
spaces. This ensures WYSIWYG for everyone involved.
Agree 100%. I try to manually match whatever sp/t
Le 19 janv. 09 à 23:38, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Bonjour Ralf!
It is true that I have been disturbed and even annoyed by tab vs.
space in some patches that gave the impression of improper
indentation.
Therefore, for a year or so, I am now using spaces only.
But it is not sufficient for Li
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> OK so it seems there are more voices for spaces.
> Can we agree to make the switch only after 2.2.8 though,
> I would like to avoid unnecessary churn ATM.
Works for me.
--
Chuck
* Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:29:52PM CET:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > For many years I have had my editor configured to always use
> > spaces. This ensures WYSIWYG for everyone involved.
>
> Agree 100%. I try to manually match whatever sp/tab convention is in
> place -- usin
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> For many years I have had my editor configured to always use
> spaces. This ensures WYSIWYG for everyone involved.
Agree 100%. I try to manually match whatever sp/tab convention is in
place -- using vi if I have to -- but much prefer all spaces.
--
Chuck
Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:44:37AM CET:
> Le 10 janv. 09 à 22:25, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>
>> Maybe we should update HACKING about the style we decide about?
>> (note this is really just bike shedding, and babbling)
>
> I definitely think this would be a good idea
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:
I have worked for years with the same set up as you, using an much TAB as is
possible. But I read someday something that Jim wrote about this topic, in
which he was advocating the no-tab approach, and I was convinced. What
changed my viewpoint was th
Le 10 janv. 09 à 22:25, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
BTW, your editor seems to both reformat existing code, and use
different indenting strategy for new code. Hmm.
Yeah, I know. But fixing the indentation issues progressively does
not
seem bad to me. I certainly don't want these useless di
10 matches
Mail list logo
