close 13414
thanks
Hi!
On 2013-01-22 19:45, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Erik van Pienbroek schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 15:54 [+0100]:
>> Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
>>> But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
>>> those actually using .def fil
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 15:54 [+0100]:
> Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
> > But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
> > those actually using .def files for real things.
>
> Thanks for the patch. To help out with testing I c
Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
> But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
> those actually using .def files for real things.
Thanks for the patch. To help out with testing I can perform a test mass
rebuild of all mingw packages which are currently
On 2013-01-19 06:12, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> On 19 Jan 2013, at 05:55, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the latest git
Hi Peter,
Thanks for working on this.
On 19 Jan 2013, at 05:55, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
>>> I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the latest git revision)
>>> which mangles valid DLL def files under M
Hi Martin, Erik,
On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the latest git revision)
>> which mangles valid DLL def files under MinGW and makes the lin
