* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 08:47:03PM CET:
> Den 2009-01-24 14:03, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>> * Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:00:15PM CET:
>>> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2009 2:37 AM:
>>
>> Ah yes, that sounds like it was the problem here. Surely that makes
Den 2009-01-24 14:03, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:00:15PM CET:
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2009 2:37 AM:
One funny thing (funny strange, not haha) is that the ChangeLog entries
from master appeared in reverse order in the pr-msvc-support ChangeL
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:00:15PM CET:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2009 2:37 AM:
> >> One funny thing (funny strange, not haha) is that the ChangeLog entries
> >> from master appeared in reverse order in the pr-msvc-support ChangeLog
> >> after the merge, and I had to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2009 2:37 AM:
>> One funny thing (funny strange, not haha) is that the ChangeLog entries
>> from master appeared in reverse order in the pr-msvc-support ChangeLog
>> after the merge, and I had to fix that up manuall
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 04:39:02PM CET:
>
> I'm preparing a merge with master now instead. Just got to run the
> testsuite on a couple of $hosts/compilers (sigh) before I push...
>
> One funny thing (funny strange, not haha) is that the ChangeLog entries
> from master appeared i
Den 2009-01-23 16:39 skrev Peter Rosin:
I'm preparing a merge with master now instead. Just got to run the
testsuite on a couple of $hosts/compilers (sigh) before I push...
Four hours later, and four popups later, the testsuite has completed
as expected on Cygwin and MSYS/MSVC.
That's on a dua
Den 2009-01-23 07:57 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
OK. That way you did not merge the rest of master's current changes
into pr-msvc-support. I would not have minded if you had done that,
either, but it doesn't matter.
The ChangeLog rotation made it complex (at least it looked complex to me)
and I di
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:01:00AM CET:
> Den 2009-01-22 21:54 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>>
>> 1) create, in your own repository, a new branch pr-tests-newline-fixes
>> containing this one patch, then merge this patch into both
>> pr-msvc-support and into master, then push the last
Den 2009-01-22 21:54 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:57:20AM CET:
Something like the attached?
Yes, with nits below addressed.
Ok, so push to master or pr-msvc-support?
This change is ok for both. However, let's move away from manual
additi
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:57:20AM CET:
>>> Something like the attached?
>>
>> Yes, with nits below addressed.
> Ok, so push to master or pr-msvc-support?
This change is ok for both. However, let's move away from manual
addition of the same change to more than one
Den 2009-01-21 23:09, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:34:57AM CET:
Den 2009-01-19 21:35 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
This looks a bit hackish. We already have a handful of places which we
fixed up in order to avoid line ending issues. This one looks hackish
eno
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:34:57AM CET:
> Den 2009-01-19 21:35 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>> This looks a bit hackish. We already have a handful of places which we
>> fixed up in order to avoid line ending issues. This one looks hackish
>> enough to deserve being wrapped in a macr
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:52:50PM CET:
> Den 2009-01-19 21:35 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>>
>> I think we shouldn't be constantly rebasing pr-msvc-support. I think
>> instead when we can't decide soonish whether to merge it into master or
>> to redo it (because it would
Den 2009-01-19 21:35 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
This looks a bit hackish. We already have a handful of places which we
fixed up in order to avoid line ending issues. This one looks hackish
enough to deserve being wrapped in a macro (in testsuite.at, below
LT_AT_HOST_DATA?), so that future instances
Hi Ralf,
Den 2009-01-19 21:35 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Ok to push? Or should I just push it to the pr-msvc-support branch
for now?
I think we shouldn't be constantly rebasing pr-msvc-support. I think
instead when we can't decide soonish whether to merge it into master or
to redo it (because it
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:42:34AM CET:
> In the localization test, the output of the compiler is compared
> with the grepped output of the compiler when run through libtool.
>
> MSVC outputs its messages with \r\n, but the grep in the above
> strips that down to just
16 matches
Mail list logo
