Le 29 janv. 09 à 23:48, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:44:51PM CET:
Le 29 janv. 09 à 19:22, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
- Bootstrap failures
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00098.html
I suggest adding the following macros t
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:34:08AM CET:
>> OK to push?
>
> Fine with me. Thanks for working through this!
Pushed (credited to Akim).
--
Chuck
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:34:08AM CET:
> See earlier reply in this thread for why we don't need to worry about
> any other magic MSVC macros. So, I think the only remaining
> cleanup-warnings patch for the cwrapper is this:
>
> diff --git a/libltdl/config/ltmai
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:43:56PM CET:
>> - nuke warnings in the wrappers
>>
>> The patch at the end of
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2008-12/msg00069.html
>
> For this one I'd prefer if Charles and/or Peter took care of it, the
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Le 29 janv. 09 à 19:22, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>> For this one I'd prefer if Charles and/or Peter took care of it, they
>> have a bunch of changes in this area and some discussion going on.
>> Actually, I'd prefer to just be able to say "go!" once y'all have agreed
>> on a
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:44:51PM CET:
> Le 29 janv. 09 à 19:22, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>
>>> - Bootstrap failures
>>>
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00098.html
>>>
>>> I suggest adding the following macros to lt~obsolete.m4 to stop
>>> the
Le 29 janv. 09 à 19:22, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
- nuke warnings in the wrappers
The patch at the end of
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2008-12/msg00069.html
For this one I'd prefer if Charles and/or Peter took care of it, they
have a bunch of changes in this area and some dis
Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:43:56PM CET:
>
> Some of my patches are waiting for approvals or comments.
> I do understand that it requires time to process them, I
> just want to make sure they aren't forgotten :)
Thanks for the reminder. I think I had them all on my
