Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:44:46AM CEST:
> Den 2009-09-07 21:09 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> >>>+ eval "`$LIBTOOL --tag=$tag --config | $EGREP
> >>>'^(wl|archive_cmds|reload_cmds)='`"
> >>You are not using $reload_cmds anywhere.
> >
> >Indeed; I added it because I thoug
Den 2009-09-07 21:09 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
+ eval "`$LIBTOOL --tag=$tag --config | $EGREP
'^(wl|archive_cmds|reload_cmds)='`"
You are not using $reload_cmds anywhere.
Indeed; I added it because I thought of running a reload command, until
I realized that it wouldn't contain these flags anyw
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:57:52PM CEST:
> Den 2009-09-06 11:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> >* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
> >>If the test is going to be good enough on w32 I don't know. For gcc
> >>it should behave just as on any unix, so what's left
Hello Peters,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:35:33AM CEST:
> On Sep 6, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >+for tag in CC CXX F77 FC; do
> >+ if $LIBTOOL --tag=$tag 2>&1 | grep 'unknown tag'; then
> >+continue
> >+ fi
> I get test failures for this test on a darwi
Oops, one more thing:
+eval set program "$library_and_module"
I guess you can prevent a future patch from Roumen by changing
that to program$EXEEXT
Cheers,
Peter
Hi Ralf,
Den 2009-09-06 11:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
Den 2009-09-04 19:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Further, the patch needs a testsuite addition, but I can do that later
if you don't want to. I was thinking of a new set of
On Sep 6, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Add testsuite exposure for passing of compiler and linker flags.
* tests/flags.at (passing flags through libtool): New file, new
test, for bug fixed in previous commit.
* Makefile.am (TESTSUITE_AT): Add tests/flags.at.
+
+for tag
Hi Ralf,
Den 2009-09-06 11:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
If the test is going to be good enough on w32 I don't know. For gcc
it should behave just as on any unix, so what's left is my msvc branch
where -Wl, isn't supported ATM so I really
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
> Den 2009-09-04 19:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> >Further, the patch needs a testsuite addition, but I can do that later
> >if you don't want to. I was thinking of a new set of tests flags.at and
> >running a bunch of
> > libt
Den 2009-09-05 09:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
Ok to commit this?
Yes, thanks.
Pushed. Thanks for reviewing!
Cheer,
Peter
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
> Ok to commit this?
Yes, thanks.
Cheers,
Ralf
> 2009-09-04 Peter Rosin
>
> Make -Wc,FLAG behave like -Xcompiler FLAG in link mode.
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Remove "-Wc,"
> instead of repla
Hi Ralf,
Den 2009-09-04 19:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hello Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:38:48PM CEST:
Make -Wc,foo behave like -Xcompiler foo in link mode.
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Remove "-Wc,"
instead of replacing it with
Hello Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:38:48PM CEST:
> Make -Wc,foo behave like -Xcompiler foo in link mode.
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Remove "-Wc,"
> instead of replacing it with "$wl".
This patch is ok, but please state clearly that
13 matches
Mail list logo
