Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-01 17:31 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:12:01AM CET: >> For PDF and DVI, the text looks like this: >> >>With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see the >> GNU ld >> documentation and its ‘--enable-aut

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:12:01AM CET: > For PDF and DVI, the text looks like this: > >With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see the > GNU ld > documentation and its ‘--enable-auto-import’ option for some corner cases > when it does

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-31 20:51 skrev Peter Rosin: > Hi Ralf, > > Den 2010-10-31 10:13 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: This should have a cross reference to just that documentation. >>> >>> ...if I write: >>> >>> With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see >>> the GNU ld documentation a

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-10-31 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-10-31 10:13 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >>> This should have a cross reference to just that documentation. >> >> ...if I write: >> >> With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see >> the GNU ld documentation and its @code{--enable-auto-import} option >> for som

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-10-31 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:06:12PM CEST: > Den 2010-10-30 09:15 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:00:34PM CEST: > >> +With contemporary GNU tools, auto-import often saves the day, but see > >> +the GNU ld documentation and its @

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-10-30 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-10-30 09:15 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:00:34PM CEST: >> This time as a patch. Ok to push, or did I screw up the texification? > > Good with minor nits, but allow a day or so for comments from others. > Thanks! Cool, I agree with all

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-10-30 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ dropping libtool@ ] Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:00:34PM CEST: > This time as a patch. Ok to push, or did I screw up the texification? Good with minor nits, but allow a day or so for comments from others. Thanks! Cheers, Ralf > Subject: [PATCH] docs: Windows DLLs

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-14 12:31 skrev Peter Rosin: > Den 2010-10-13 20:50 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >> Hi Peter, >> >> * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:19:27PM CEST: >>> Can you spot any errors? >> >> See below. I've only checked for things obvious to me; I hope somebody >> else verifies the w32 s