Re: [PATCH] question mark is extended regex for non-GNU grep

2014-11-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On 11/21/2014 03:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 11/21/2014 05:11 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >>> Accepting \? for at-most-once in basic regex is a GNU grep extension, >>> not accepted by AIX grep for example. >>> * tests/libtool.

Re: [PATCH] question mark is extended regex for non-GNU grep

2014-11-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/21/2014 03:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/21/2014 05:11 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> Accepting \? for at-most-once in basic regex is a GNU grep extension, >> not accepted by AIX grep for example. >> * tests/libtool.at: Need EGREP for ? operator, and ? without \ then. >> With EGREP,

Re: [PATCH] question mark is extended regex for non-GNU grep

2014-11-21 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/21/2014 05:11 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Accepting \? for at-most-once in basic regex is a GNU grep extension, > not accepted by AIX grep for example. > * tests/libtool.at: Need EGREP for ? operator, and ? without \ then. > With EGREP, need one more \ for $. Or, stick with GREP but u