Hi Peter,
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:23:08PM CEST:
> Ping, almost a month, I don't think I got a clear yes/no on this
> One before the discussion wandered off. Only the suggestion to
> detect Microsoft link seperately, but that's a much bigger change
> and I'd like to do that
Ping, almost a month, I don't think I got a clear yes/no on this
One before the discussion wandered off. Only the suggestion to
detect Microsoft link seperately, but that's a much bigger change
and I'd like to do that later.
Cheers,
Peter
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 07:29 CES
Albert Chin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:53:58AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> > Any faults in the above? Comments?
>
> Ick. Why not just test all available "link" programs in $PATH for the
> features we want and pick the winner?
Well, I think cl will run the link that is in the same dir as
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:53:58AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > > Running "link /dump" has the same effect as running "dumpbin"; so
> > > perhaps checking for MS Link is enough - if you have identified
> > > the MS linker, you can use it to list symbols (and I imagine
> > > l
Albert Chin wrote:
> > Running "link /dump" has the same effect as running "dumpbin"; so
> > perhaps checking for MS Link is enough - if you have identified
> > the MS linker, you can use it to list symbols (and I imagine
> > libtool may need to know about the linker anyway).
>
> If dumpbin is an
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:39:19PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> FYI, the dumpbin.exe provided by Visual C++ is really just a stub
> that calls link.exe (rather like symlinking unzip as zipinfo).
>
> Running "link /dump" has the same effect as running "dumpbin"; so
> perhaps checking for MS Link
Tim Van Holder wrote:
> >>>Regarding dumpbin not being present in the 2003 version, I
> >>>*think* it's just missing from the free toolkit and that it is
> >>>still going strong in "the real" releases of Visual Studio.
> >>
> >>OK. I just can't test it then.
> >>
> >>
> Also, there seem to be
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote:
I wasn't intending to offend anyone with that remark, sorry if I
did. Regarding my work being important, I can just say that I don't
think so myself, I'm just doing it to see if it's possible and to
Your work is clearly important. There is some code (e
>>>Regarding dumpbin not being present in the 2003 version, I
>>>*think* it's just missing from the free toolkit and that it is
>>>still going strong in "the real" releases of Visual Studio.
>>
>>OK. I just can't test it then.
>>
>>
Also, there seem to be third-party programs named `dumpbin'.
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Ekberg wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:36:47PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > Missing bits below, plus: We advertise `NM' in libtool.texi as BSD
> > > compatible, and show how its output looks like (two different
> > > sections). We sho
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote:
> > No problem at all, I'm just beginning to feel that I have soon
> > filled the quota for at least some people with very similar-
> > looking patches, and that people are perhaps no longer reading.
> > So I just pictured your reque
Hi Peter,
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:36:47PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Missing bits below, plus: We advertise `NM' in libtool.texi as BSD
> > compatible, and show how its output looks like (two different
> > sections). We should update that, if possible. If you w
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote:
Lastly, can I ask a favor of you? I've seen your other patches, and
hate to delay them even longer, but I won't be able to test
them enough
before the weekend. So I'd like you to not use the 72 hour rule.
Thanks. I'll try to get to them as quickly as
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 20:54
> To: Peter Ekberg
> Cc: libtool-patches@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:20:58PM CEST:
> >
> > I
Hi Peter,
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:20:58PM CEST:
>
> I have forked out this patch (against HEAD) from my MSVC work.
Good work.
Missing bits below, plus: We advertise `NM' in libtool.texi as BSD
compatible, and show how its output looks like (two different sections).
We sh
15 matches
Mail list logo
