H. J. Lu writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
> > >>>I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
> > >>>tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Bulding an XXX language run-time library is a very special case. You
> > can't build an XXX language run-time library, assuming the XXX language
> > compiler is fully functional. If upstream libtool can support it, it
> > is great. Otherwise, we ha
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:09:22PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
> >
> > Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
> > >>> I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
> > >>> tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
> Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
> >>> I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
> >>> tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like tests
> >>> for PIC, it's pointless: gcj supports the same option
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
> >>>I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
> >>>tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like tests
> >>>for PIC, it's pointle
Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like tests
for PIC, it's pointless: gcj supports the same options as gcc.
Then, does anybody know the very reason w
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > > Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
> >
> >I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
> >tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like tests
> >for PIC, it's pointless
> Certainly. Any compile-and-link tests won't work.
I'm sorry, I missed the "and link" part of your question. Configury
tests of this kind really aren't going to work. For things like tests
for PIC, it's pointless: gcj supports the same options as gcc.
Then, does anybody know the very rea
