* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:19:26AM CEST:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >The current text in the "Updating version info" node is seen as hard to
> >understand by some users, IIRC we've had a few reports about this in the
> >past. Richard made me try to r
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>
>> The most important question is whether it is correct, not only for
>> Linux. That's what I'm not yet certain about.
>
> Something tells me that it is not correct for Windows.
Ralf's description is correct also for Window
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:47:55AM CEST:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >The most important question is whether it is correct, not only for
> >Linux. That's what I'm not yet certain about.
>
> Something tells me that it is not correct for Windows. Und
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The most important question is whether it is correct, not only for
Linux. That's what I'm not yet certain about.
Something tells me that it is not correct for Windows. Under Windows
I see a lack of versioning and libtool adds a simple number like
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:19:26AM CEST:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >The current text in the "Updating version info" node is seen as hard to
> >understand by some users, IIRC we've had a few reports about this in the
> >past. Richard made me
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The current text in the "Updating version info" node is seen as hard to
understand by some users, IIRC we've had a few reports about this in the
past. Richard made me try to reformulate it now.
What do you think about this additional explanation?
OK
The current text in the "Updating version info" node is seen as hard to
understand by some users, IIRC we've had a few reports about this in the
past. Richard made me try to reformulate it now.
What do you think about this additional explanation?
OK to apply (and ok to add you to THANKS, Richard)
