Den 2010-08-10 20:27 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:15:21AM CEST:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:33AM CEST:
On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
m4_defun([AM_PROG_AR],
[AC_CHECK_TOOLS(AR, [ar], false)
: ${AR=ar}
AC_SUBST
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:15:21AM CEST:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:33AM CEST:
> > On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > > m4_defun([AM_PROG_AR],
> > > [AC_CHECK_TOOLS(AR, [ar], false)
> > > : ${AR=ar}
> > > AC_SUBST([AR])dnl
> > > ])#
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:33AM CEST:
> On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > m4_defun([AM_PROG_AR],
> > [AC_CHECK_TOOLS(AR, [ar], false)
> > : ${AR=ar}
> > AC_SUBST([AR])dnl
> > ])# AM_PROG_AR
> > ])
>
> Just like that!
NAK. I don't have time to explain now
On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Peter,
> A macro by the name AM_PROG_AR might be on its way into Automake,
> and I would like to use it sooner rather than later. But I don't
> think it is prudent to require an Automake version which has the
> macro. Would something like this
Hi!
A macro by the name AM_PROG_AR might be on its way into Automake,
and I would like to use it sooner rather than later. But I don't
think it is prudent to require an Automake version which has the
macro. Would something like this be a workable solution in
libtool.m4 (untested, needs adjustment
