Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:04:16PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > However, I think this patch below should be checked in (HEAD,
> > branch-2-0). OK?
>
> Agreed.
Done.
Thanks,
Ralf
> > --- configure.ac12 Dec 2004 16:24:28 - 1.62
> > +++ configur
Hi Bob, Noah,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:47:26PM CET:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
> >
> >I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, afte
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:32:05PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
>
> I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
> running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
stamp-vcl .. seems like timestamp files don't
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> However, I think this patch below should be checked in (HEAD,
> branch-2-0). OK?
Agreed.
> --- configure.ac 12 Dec 2004 16:24:28 - 1.62
> +++ configure.ac 11 Mar 2005 16:35:44 -
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
> AC_SUBST([M4SH], ['$(AUTOM4TE) --language=m
I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
stamp-vcl .. seems like timestamp files don't work with it at all.
(No, I don't want
