OS/2: command-line length limit (was: Enhanced OS/2 port)

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello again, * KO Myung-Hun wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:20:32AM CET: > --- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4.org 2010-09-22 17:41:18.0 +0900 > +++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 2010-11-27 16:03:50.0 +0900 > @@ -1624,6 +1624,9 @@ >lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=32768 > fi > ;; > + os

Re: Enhanced OS/2 port

2010-12-16 Thread KO Myung-Hun
Hi/2. Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ adding libtool-patches@; followups can remove libtool@ ] > > * KO Myung-Hun wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:20:32AM CET: >> I've enhanced and fixed libtool 2.4 for OS/2. > > Thanks again for working on this. > > Generally, we prefer one patch per logical change

Re: Enhanced OS/2 port

2010-12-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:32:04PM CET: > --- a/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 > +++ b/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 > @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ AC_REQUIRE([AC_CANONICAL_BUILD])dnl > AC_REQUIRE([_LT_PREPARE_SED_QUOTE_VARS])dnl > AC_REQUIRE([_LT_PROG_ECHO_BACKSLASH])dnl > > +_LT_DECL([], [PATH_

Re: Enhanced OS/2 port

2010-12-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ adding libtool-patches@; followups can remove libtool@ ] * KO Myung-Hun wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:20:32AM CET: > I've enhanced and fixed libtool 2.4 for OS/2. Thanks again for working on this. Generally, we prefer one patch per logical change, and GNU-style ChangeLog entries. Also, we