Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 02:06:33PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:19:39PM CET:
> > | +elif { ( cd "$my_srcdir" && $TAR cf - "$my_file" > /dev/null 2>&1; )
> > \
> > | +| ( cd "$my_destdir" && "$T
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo!
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:19:39PM CET:
> | +elif { ( cd "$my_srcdir" && $TAR cf - "$my_file" > /dev/null 2>&1; ) \
> | +| ( cd "$my_destdir" && "$TAR" xf - > /dev/null 2>&1; ) } ; then
>
> Just don't ever let anyone
Hi Gary,
(working on mail backlog..)
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:19:39PM CET:
|
| # func_copy_cb filename srcdir destdir
| -# A wrapper for func_copy that accepts arguments in the order
| -# used by func_copy_all_files callbacks.
| +# If option `--copy' was specified, or s
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
If by ugly, you are referring to 2 forked tars per file copy, I did
it this way to minimise code churn on branch-2-0. I agree that it
would be sensible to rewrite the func_copy_* functions to collect a
filtered list of filenames, and then copy them all in on serial operation
Hi Peter!
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> | Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
> |
> | If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
> |
>
> Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.
Okay, thanks! It appears to be doing the right thing he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
| Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
|
| If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
|
Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGI
Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/li
