On 25 Oct 2021 15:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
> We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're
> a waste of space. This patch filters libtools list of paths to encoode and
> removes the ones we don't need.
>
> Libtool may be passed link paths of the form "/usr/lib/../li
Hi All
Information below is not enough to understand details.
Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 20:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 25 Oct 2021 15:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're
a waste of space. This patch fi
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 20:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 25 Oct 2021 15:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're
> > a waste of space. This patch filters libtools list of paths to encoode and
> > removes the ones we don't need.
On 25 Oct 2021 15:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
> We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're
> a waste of space. This patch filters libtools list of paths to encoode and
> removes the ones we don't need.
how are you defining "linker" ? are you talking about the runti
We don't want to add RPATHS which match default linker search paths, they're
a waste of space. This patch filters libtools list of paths to encoode and
removes the ones we don't need.
Libtool may be passed link paths of the form "/usr/lib/../lib" so normalize
the paths before comparision.
Signed-
