Re: [PATCH] tests: don't feed -no-undefined to the linker during, configure.

2012-09-19 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-19 21:25, Roumen Petrov wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: * tests/deplibs-mingw.at: Restore LDFLAGS for the configure run so that the linker does not see -no-undefined. Makes the test pass instead of skip on MinGW. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- tests/deplibs-mingw.at

Re: [PATCH] tests: don't feed -no-undefined to the linker during, configure.

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-09-19 21:25, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Peter Rosin wrote: >> * tests/deplibs-mingw.at: Restore LDFLAGS for the configure run so that >> the linker does not see -no-undefined. Makes the test pass instead of >> skip on MinGW. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin >> --- >> tests/deplibs-mingw.at |

Re: [PATCH] tests: don't feed -no-undefined to the linker during, configure.

2012-09-19 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: * tests/deplibs-mingw.at: Restore LDFLAGS for the configure run so that the linker does not see -no-undefined. Makes the test pass instead of skip on MinGW. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- tests/deplibs-mingw.at |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

[PATCH] tests: don't feed -no-undefined to the linker during, configure.

2012-09-18 Thread Peter Rosin
* tests/deplibs-mingw.at: Restore LDFLAGS for the configure run so that the linker does not see -no-undefined. Makes the test pass instead of skip on MinGW. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- tests/deplibs-mingw.at |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Ok to push? Or should I