On 21 Sep 2010, at 12:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks again for the review.
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
>> Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
>> an error for make to help catch the case where someon
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:44:41AM CEST:
> With those addressed, and another successful distcheck, okay to push?
Sure.
Thanks,
Ralf
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
> Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
> an error for make to help catch the case where someone commits a change
> to the first paragraph of README without a matching edit to the sed
> express
Hallo Ralf,
On 21 Sep 2010, at 00:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> a regression: this code will cause 'make distcheck' to
> fail, because at 'make dist' time the file will be rewritten before
> being added to the tarball (if the version doesn't indicate a stable
> release), then when distcheck tries t
