Den 2010-09-24 19:37 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:30:07AM CEST:
>> Den 2010-09-24 06:20 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>>> The part about this patch which I'm unsure about is this:
>>>
>>> Does the testsuite otherwise cover well enough the fact that
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:30:07AM CEST:
> Den 2010-09-24 06:20 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> > The part about this patch which I'm unsure about is this:
> >
> > Does the testsuite otherwise cover well enough the fact that users may
> > name their modules with or without
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-09-24 06:20 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> Hello Peter,
>
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:44:43AM CEST:
>> need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC. I think the test
>> is there to ensure that "weird" systems continue to work even
>> if the testsuite is running on
unsure about is this:
Does the testsuite otherwise cover well enough the fact that users may
name their modules with or without leading 'lib' prefix (and with .la or
.dll or .so suffix or so)?
IOW, I'd like to be sure we're not hiding anything here.
And yes, I think (part of)
Den 2010-09-20 23:30 skrev Roumen Petrov:
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-09-18 00:04 skrev Roumen Petrov:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
>>>
>>> Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined
>>>
Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-09-18 00:04 skrev Roumen Petrov:
Hi Peter,
Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined flag.
Did libtool MSC allow creation of shared libraries without -no-undefine
Den 2010-09-18 00:04 skrev Roumen Petrov:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
>
> Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined flag.
>
> Did libtool MSC allow creation of shared libraries without -no-undefined
Hi Peter,
Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined
flag.
Did libtool MSC allow creation of shared libraries without -no-undefined ?
On windows platforms (msc, gcc(mingw*)) may be the test
se? Because this would
never happen in the wild, right?
Oh, and one more thing, there's no rush for this one.
Cheers,
Peter
>From d23b133decabf20349e7b2a13aec5b1ce070b03c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:17:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Skip need_lib_prefix
