* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:04:07AM CET:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>
>> We may need to think about speeding up func_to_host_path, e.g., by not
>> forking for arguments that don't need conversion, or by converting
>> several paths with a constant amount of
Den 2009-01-21 22:54, skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:26:36AM CET:
This patch together with [1] and [2] will make "Run tests with
low max_cmd_len" on MSYS/MSVC behave the same as the individual
tests.
The patch fixes a couple more o
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
We may need to think about speeding up func_to_host_path, e.g., by not
forking for arguments that don't need conversion, or by converting
several paths with a constant amount of forks. But that can be done
separately.
There is also the possibility o
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:11:22PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > We may need to think about speeding up func_to_host_path, e.g., by not
> > forking for arguments that don't need conversion, or by converting
> > several paths with a constant amount of forks. But that c
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> We may need to think about speeding up func_to_host_path, e.g., by not
> forking for arguments that don't need conversion, or by converting
> several paths with a constant amount of forks. But that can be done
> separately.
FWIW, as part of re-writing this:
[PATCH] [cygw
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:26:36AM CET:
> This patch together with [1] and [2] will make "Run tests with
> low max_cmd_len" on MSYS/MSVC behave the same as the individual
> tests.
>
> The patch fixes a couple more of the /abs/path issues alre
Hi!
This patch together with [1] and [2] will make "Run tests with
low max_cmd_len" on MSYS/MSVC behave the same as the individual
tests.
The patch fixes a couple more of the /abs/path issues already
fixed in [1] and [2]. However, I fear that these hunks may be
more controversial, as
