Hi!
It's been quite a while, but now i'd have a small patch for interix libtool
(again). The background for the patch is building GLIB on interix, which
initially didn't succeed. Actually, libtool did nothing wrong, just the system
linker is broken in so many different ways, that each day a new
us
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
> docs: mention shell requirement for libtool script.
>
> * doc/libtool.texi (Invoking libtool): Document that the shell
> used to invoke libtool needs to be the same used to configure
> it.
> * THANKS: Update.
> Report
Hi
I'm working (together with haubi) on getting DESTDIR support for our
hppa-hpux boxes into libtool. I now have it working, and a first patch
(which of course breaks some other things - I know that :( ), and wanted to
ask what you think about this.
I'm adding +s to every link line. But because I
>
> Markus Duft skrev:
> >> I Forgot to answer some things...
> >>
> >
> >> My patches use the same host/build as MinGW when using MSYS, on the
> >> grounds that the output from the MinGW tools and MSVC are compatible
> >> (so same $host)
>
> I Forgot to answer some things...
>
>
> My patches use the same host/build as MinGW when using MSYS, on the
> grounds that the output from the MinGW tools and MSVC are compatible
> (so same $host) and that MSYS is MSYS (same $build). That's also
> how cccl has it (at least I think so...)
H
Forwarding because i forgot to add libtool-patches to CC...
>
> >
> > Markus Duft skrev:
> > > Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet,
> but
> > I
> > > still hope, that ralf comes to looking into my patch some day
&
>
> Markus Duft skrev:
> >> Also, your changes to tests/duplicate_conv.at is (or, to be correct,
> >> "will probably be") addressed by setting reload_cmds to false (patch
> >> pending on libtool-patches@). Hold on! This is exactly what was
> >>
>
> Peter Rosin skrev:
> > Hi Markus,
> >
>
> Hold on! Since parity is using a $host matching *winnt*, this patch
> doesn't
> affect parity at all.
Yeah, right, i oversaw that :)
>
> > BTW, did you file a copyright assignment?
Sure, now 2 years ago, or so...
Cheers, Markus
> >
> I'm t
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Ralf Wildenhues skrev:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
>
> So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to:
> if test "$GCC" != yes; then
>reload_cmds=false
> fi
>
> Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet, but I
still hope, that ra
