Hi/2.
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Nov 27, 2014, at 4:53 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>>
On 27 Nov 2014, at 02:47, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
I agree.
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I pushed the core of a new macro that does exactly that to M4 master jus
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:35:00 + "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2014, at 17:59, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On FreeBSD we have switched from using .so.$current as library extension
>> to .so.$major.$age.$revision where $major is $current-$age. Our package
>> of libtool has been patched simi
Hi Tijl,
Thanks for the patches.
> On 27 Nov 2014, at 17:59, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>
> On FreeBSD we have switched from using .so.$current as library extension
> to .so.$major.$age.$revision where $major is $current-$age. Our package
> of libtool has been patched similar to the patch below whi
On FreeBSD we have switched from using .so.$current as library extension
to .so.$major.$age.$revision where $major is $current-$age. Our package
of libtool has been patched similar to the patch below which you can see
here: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/libtool/files/
The "freebsd-e
"libtoolize --ltdl -c" creates some files with write permissions for
everybody because it sets "umask 0" in two places. This patch removes
the umask commands.
---
libtoolize.in | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libtoolize.in b/libtoolize.in
index d
Hi,
> On Nov 27, 2014, at 4:53 AM, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>>> On 27 Nov 2014, at 02:47, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I pushed the core of a new macro that does exactly that to M4 master just
now.
Would you let me
