On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Christophe Jarry wrote:
Please learn to use git for sending patches; thanks!
The new patch is attached.
Please tell me if there are still issues with it.
This patch looks ok to apply to me.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.or
> Please learn to use git for sending patches; thanks!
The new patch is attached.
Please tell me if there are still issues with it.
Christophe
>From 965eb1b22d3350ee24765b0c115a91512a382f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Jarry
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:49:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Rep
On 5-Sep-11, at 12:08 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I pushed this patch on Saturday.
Thanks.
Dave, I've attached an approximation of what the patch would do to
gcc's ltmain.sh and an addition to boehm-gc's .exp file. Both
completely untested, of course :-)
I'll give this patch a try in m
On 09/01/2011 06:51 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Though I am sorely tempted to simply delete those warnings altogether, I
think the --no-warn option is better.
I'll give you a day to veto this patch, if you don't then I will commit
on Saturday. It essentially copies the --no-warn flag from libtool
