* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:45:37PM CEST:
> Is there interest (besides mine) in libtool being able to use native
> Windows compilers from cygwin. I just find cygwin easier to
> use/maintain than mingw/msys.
>
> In the branch I had been working on, I defined the libtool v
On 8/13/2010 8:50 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-08-13 13:45 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
>> Peter: I think you are targeting mingw correct? I am targeting purely
>> native Windows. Is there actually any difference in these? Would it
>> make sense to have a windows host type (e.g. i686-pc-windows
Den 2010-08-13 13:45 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
> Is there interest (besides mine) in libtool being able to use native
> Windows compilers from cygwin. I just find cygwin easier to
> use/maintain than mingw/msys.
Absolutely. But first things first. But, as I've stated previously,
MSVC is close to
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Den 2010-08-13 12:26 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Christopher Hulbert asked for some MSVC status in a private message,
>>> but I figured more people might be int
Den 2010-08-12 19:49 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:28:57PM CEST:
>> This is a patch that makes use of @FILE support in the
>> archiver, if the archiver supports it. That makes linking
>> succeed for long command lines when using MSVC, as MSVC
Hi Chris,
Den 2010-08-13 12:26 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Christopher Hulbert asked for some MSVC status in a private message,
>> but I figured more people might be interested. So, I'm posting a
>> testsuite log from libtool master
