Re: [PATCH] Rename _LT_PROG_XSI_REPLACE macro to _LT_PROG_FUNCTION_REPLACE.

2010-07-08 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 9 Jul 2010, at 12:48, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 07/08/2010 08:27 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Pushed as obvious: >> >> While it looks large, the entire patch was made with a 5-line sed script >> that replaces "XSI" with "Extended shell" or similar as appropriate to >> each context,

Re: [PATCH] Rename _LT_PROG_XSI_REPLACE macro to _LT_PROG_FUNCTION_REPLACE.

2010-07-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 07/08/2010 08:27 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Pushed as obvious: While it looks large, the entire patch was made with a 5-line sed script that replaces "XSI" with "Extended shell" or similar as appropriate to each context, followed by some manual layout cleanups and a complete run of the testsu

Re: verbose test output (was: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.)

2010-07-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I am thinking that the many test failures under Debian Linux are due to it using older tool versions such as Autoconf 2.61. Facts, not thinking, please. We cannot read your computer's mind. In this case, the thinking was correct. Many Debian test

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.2.10-59-g8c4dae1

2010-07-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ moving from -commit ] Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:37:23PM CEST: > commit 8c4dae1232958c24989f31ab5b5768d00be2ef03 > Author: Gary V. Vaughan > Date: Thu Jul 8 18:47:59 2010 +0700 > > Fix a spurious trailing space and a botched merge. > > * libltdl

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add sysroot support.

2010-07-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 07/07/2010 11:51 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: Hi, the following patch adds support for gcc's --sysroot argument to libtool. I'll post the patch first and will reply to it, giving more details where needed. I've been building a number of packages with variations of this patch depending on the li

verbose test output (was: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.)

2010-07-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:46PM CEST: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> > >>Perhaps things are not all that bad. While 35 of 110 tests fail > >>under Debian Linux, only these two extra are failing under FreeBSD, > >>OS-X, and Solaris: > >> > >

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Perhaps things are not all that bad. While 35 of 110 tests fail under Debian Linux, only these two extra are failing under FreeBSD, OS-X, and Solaris: FAIL: tests/mdemo2-make.test FAIL: tests/pdemo-make.test It would probably be even more helpful if

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

2010-07-08 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-07-06 07:52 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, any chance you could post your patches inline? Thanks. Will do in the future, I hope they will not end up wrapped though... * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:45:28PM CEST: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool

[PATCH] Rename _LT_PROG_XSI_REPLACE macro to _LT_PROG_FUNCTION_REPLACE.

2010-07-08 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Pushed as obvious: While it looks large, the entire patch was made with a 5-line sed script that replaces "XSI" with "Extended shell" or similar as appropriate to each context, followed by some manual layout cleanups and a complete run of the testsuite. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_PROG_XSI_SHELL

Re: MSVC: Support for response files with $NM.

2010-07-08 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-07-06 11:27 skrev Peter Rosin: + output_la=`$ECHO "X$output" | $Xsed -e "$basename"` save 2 fork&exec: func_basename "$output" output_la=$func_basename_result Yes, good point. I'll send a patch later if noone beats me to it, since it might easily take me a couple of days to get to i