Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 06:48:56AM CEST: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am > >seeing plenty of failures now for all Unixish targets. Even Linux > >blows failures all over the place. Not

Re: MSVC: Support for response files with $NM.

Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:45:47PM CEST: > The MSVC linker can't do relinking (-r -o), and this patch avoids > a usage of that in libtool when it digs for symbols in large > numbers of object files. With the patch I get identical behavior > inside "Run tests with low

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

Hi Peter, any chance you could post your patches inline? Thanks. * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:45:28PM CEST: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00152.html This is ok with nits below addressed, thanks. > Make preloading heed libname_spec. >

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. It would be good if the progress was even more remarkable. Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am seeing plenty

Re: MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. It would be good if the progress was even more remarkable. Yesterday's libtool was doing quite good with the tests but I am seeing plenty of failures now for all Unixish targets. Ev

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static (take 8?)

On 7/5/2010 2:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Just to clarify, that isn't what I meant -- rather, "well, I disagree, and > as you can see, despite its faults, patch X alone already makes things > less bad than they were previously. Is it okay if I push X in its current > state, and then tackle

MSVC: Preloading in ltdl doesn't heed libname_spec.

Hi! Inspired by the remarkable progress, I'm bringing up this patch again. The discussion dead-ended last time without anything being merged into any branch, but follow this thread to get up to speed: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00152.html The patch has seen (ve

Re: MSVC: Support for response files with $NM.

Hi Gary, Den 2010-07-05 09:57 skrev Gary V. Vaughan: While I haven't tested (it should have no effect on the hosts I use anyway!), I read through the previous discussions. Also, by inspection, the code looks good to me, and more than 72 hours have passed without objections having been raised, s

Re: MSVC: Make export.at pass

Hi Peter, On 5 Jul 2010, at 13:43, Peter Rosin wrote: > I'd like to make the "Export test" work on MSVC. > > Therefore I'm asking if I can cherry-pick commit > 89a3cdc7a57314fb3ca8f57bf47afd20809e5608 > "* tests/export.at [MSVC]: dllimport all imported variables." > into master (the patch is also

Re: MSVC: Support for response files with $NM.

Hi Peter, On 2 Jul 2010, at 19:45, Peter Rosin wrote: > Ok to push? > 2010-07-01 Ralf Wildenhues > Peter Rosin > > Support for response files with $NM. > * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS) > : New tag variable. Set it to '@' if input > files c