Hello Karl, Paul,
* Karl Berry wrote on Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:33:14AM CEST:
> why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt list these files as GPL, as do
> the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz says LGPL, and libltdl is
> distributed with LGPL + special exception?
>
> I don't recall any d
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before syncinc argz* with gnulib: why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt
> list these files as GPL, as do the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz
> says LGPL, and libltdl is distributed with LGPL + special exception?
For the same reason libc files are l
why does gnulib/config/srclist.txt list these files as GPL, as do
the gnulib file headers, but modules/argz says LGPL, and libltdl is
distributed with LGPL + special exception?
I don't recall any deep reasoning behind the gpl in srclist.txt for
these. Probably just blindly copied? So
This rather mechanical patch fixes one half of the issue of mixing
pointers to data and pointers to functions, by changing the set of
callback functions to using two pointers to void and one pointer to
a function type (since we only need one function signature, there
is no problem with just using t
[ no need to discuss this on libtool rather than -patches ]
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:55:21PM CEST:
> According to Paul Eggert on 8/26/2006 12:43 AM:
> >
> > The basic idea is that source files should include config.h
> > unconditionally, so that we needn't clutter "make" outp
