Re: document AS_SHELL_SANITIZE and AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE

2006-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Paul, * Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:47:13PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * doc/autoconf.texi (Programming in M4sh): Document > > AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE and AS_SHELL_SANITIZE. > > Thanks. I installed that, with the following I-hope-im

Re: document AS_SHELL_SANITIZE and AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE

2006-02-13 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (_AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE): Renamed to.. > (AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE): ..this. > (_AS_RUN, AS_SHELL_SANITIZE): Adjusted all callers. > * doc/autoconf.texi (Programming in M4sh): Document > AS_BOURN

Re: whole_archive_flag_spec and reload_cmds (PGI)

2006-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:37:09PM CET: > PGI compilers are currently the only ones for which libtool uses > comma-separated archives in whole_archive_flag_spec currently. The > hack below makes them work for reload_cmds, too, where we use $LD > directly. Exposed by duplic

document AS_SHELL_SANITIZE and AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE (was: Word splitting with zsh fix)

2006-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Dearest autoconf-patches readers, ;-) * somewhere in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.bugs/5298: > > In the shell wrapper, we need the effect of _AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE, but > not AS_SHELL_SANITIZE: the executed program should run in the user's > locale. > I'll write to autoconf-pat

Re: Word splitting with zsh fix

2006-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ moving to libtool-patches; sorry for the first-post moderation ] Hi Raúl, * DervishD wrote on Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:33:15AM CET: > * Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > * DervishD wrote on Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:22:26PM CET: > > > I've spotted a problem with libtool that has

Re: msvs support

2006-02-13 Thread Peter Ekberg
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:21:46AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:15:11PM CET: > > I think I remember Ralf saying something about a list of tests that > > are needed in order for the patch to be commitable. Is this something > > I can