Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:28:00PM CEST:
>
> I will also try to do 1.5.20 this weekend, for the ultra-stable lovers.
wohoo! thanks in advance! :)
cheers,
dalibor topic
A little rant: There are just too many combinations.
(There is also useful information at the end, after the ##).
Suppose you would like to use libltdl. You could:
a) Use only an installed libltdl, do not ship your own at all
b) Ship your own, but do not install that
c) Ship your own, also
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:28:00PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >I have re-diffed this against current CVS HEAD, including changes for my
> >complaints. Unless anybody complains, I will apply this soon and
> >backport to branch-2-0, killing yet another impediment to
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Peter Ekberg wrote:
Lastly, can I ask a favor of you? I've seen your other patches, and
hate to delay them even longer, but I won't be able to test
them enough
before the weekend. So I'd like you to not use the 72 hour rule.
Thanks. I'll try to get to them as quickly as
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary, others,
Hallo Ralf!
I have re-diffed this against current CVS HEAD, including changes for my
complaints. Unless anybody complains, I will apply this soon and
backport to branch-2-0, killing yet another impediment to 2.0. :)
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 20:54
> To: Peter Ekberg
> Cc: libtool-patches@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Ekberg wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:20:58PM CEST:
> >
> > I have forked out this patch (against
Hi Gary, others,
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:47:32PM CEST:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:56:23PM CEST:
[ old patch, see here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-05/msg00114.html
]
> Here is my review for that patch. I believe it
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:56:31PM CEST:
>
> I have re-diffed this against current CVS HEAD, including changes for my
> complaints. Unless anybody complains, I will apply this soon and
> backport to branch-2-0, killing yet another impediment to 2.0. :)
And of course I ha
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 10:30:24AM CEST:
> The manpage of objformat reveals that upcoming FreeBSD 6 might not have
> it any more. OK for this patch (all branches) to cater for this?
Applied.
Cheers,
Ralf
> * m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [ freebsd ]: Do
