Re: Cleaning up libtool.m4, ltdl.m4 and configure.ac (Was: Re: FYI: Fixlet for missing braces around sys_search_path)

2005-05-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Dalibor Topic wrote: Sometimese a little deprecation is a good thing. Agreed. I think that the warnings are not there simply due to sloth ... I'd like to apologize if I came off sounding that way, that was certainly not my intention. Thank you all for y

Re: Small fix for 1.5.16 to turn off installation on default

2005-05-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dalibor Topic wrote: | | Ralf, thank you very much for taking care of libtool's 1.5 branch and | pushing regular releases out with the team. [1] Would a 1.5.18/1.5.16.1 | with just that single fix be faster to get out, by chance? | | cheers, | dalibor t

Re: Fixlet for missing braces around sys_search_path

2005-05-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Dalibor, * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:56:18AM CEST: > * Dalibor Topic wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:20:34PM CEST: > > > > here is another patch from Kaffe's libtool patch chest, which adds the > > missing braces around $sys_search_path in the definition of > > LTDL_S

Re: Fixlet for missing braces around sys_search_path

2005-05-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Dalibor, We're back here again. Stepan Kasal made it clear to me (on the autoconf-patches list) that this change: | < AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH, "$sys_search_path", | --- | > AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH, ["$sys_search_path"], could not possibly h

Re: cygwin/mingw experiences

2005-05-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ _really_ old thread, but new info, and a patch :) ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:34:53PM CET: > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:29:40PM CET: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > - something is broken in the Makefile rules that causes regeneration > > > of t

Re: cygwin/mingw experiences

2005-05-01 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > comparing a unix file and a windows one with cmp > is bound to lead to failures. (Yes, certainly I do have my test cygwin > set up with crnl line endings. I _want_ to see all possible bugs.) > > OK to apply (HEAD, branch-2-0)? Yes, looks good to me. Thanks! > Note that

LES CHAMPAGNES TROUILLARD A KINSHASA : NOUVELLE ARRIVAGE DE CHAMPAGNE A DES PRIX COMPETITIFS

2005-05-01 Thread AD.MAILING
Si ce message n'apparaît pas correctement, cliquez ici. http://www.digitalmailing.cd/trouillard/index_champagne_trouillard.htm     Pour pouvoir lire cette « Information Promotionnelle » en

allow running libtool tests at configure time [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-26]

2005-05-01 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
[[Resending, as it is not an "FYI", but rather an "okay to commit?"]] This may not apply cleanly to HEAD, as I developed it on my own branch which still has the pending standalone libtool patch awaiting. Unless anyone points out any other showstoppers for 2.0, I would like to apply this patch (an