[/begin beat dead horse]
Howard Chu wrote:
Sorry, I was looking at 1.4.3, which is nowhere near as sophisticated as
that. Still the point remains, there's a fair chunk of processing here
to determine some things that the linker now handles transparently.
^^^
Hi all,
here is another patch from Kaffe's libtool patch chest, which adds the
missing braces around $sys_search_path in the definition of
LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH. That fixes libtool for at least one platform, though
I don't recall which any more :(
ChangeLog:
2004-03-12 Riccardo Mottola <[EMAIL PR
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:34:53PM CEST:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >BTW: Does anyone have access to non-gcc compilers on win32 and some
> >incentive to test Libtool HEAD with them?
> My understanding is that both the Microsoft and Borland command-l
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
BTW: Does anyone have access to non-gcc compilers on win32 and some
incentive to test Libtool HEAD with them? We need more test coverage
there (and probably a couple of patches, too).
My understanding is that both the Microsoft and Borland command-line
Hi Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:14:37PM CEST:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00282.html
> should have gone to 1.5 branch as well, I think.
Applied.
Thanks,
Ralf
Hi all,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00282.html
should have gone to 1.5 branch as well, I think.
cheers,
dalibor topic
Hi all,
I've updated Kaffe [1] CVS head to libtool 1.5.16 and noticed that it
broke make distcheck of Kaffe by installing and leaving libltdl files
around in $prefix/share/libtool, which 1.5.14 didn't do.
Looking at the changes, it seems that the install-data-local section ini
Makefile.am shoul
