Re: consolidate Makefile.ams [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-17]

2005-04-11 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This changeset came about as a side effect of trying to make libltdl/Makefile.am work as a standalone top-level Makefile, for correct installation with `libtoolize --ltdl'. And Ralf's mail describing why call

Re: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate

2005-04-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Ah, you mean using _LT_TAGVAR without also using _LT_TAGDECL, right? Yes, _LT_TAGVAR abstracts per language variables, _LT_TAGDECL pushes them through config.status. > Anyway, the changes you want me to make make more other changes > necessary. Will look int

Re: fix order of -L flags added for libtool dep libs

2005-04-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | - *) deplibs="$deplibs $path" ;; | + *) deplibs="$path $deplibs" ;; This is different to the patch for Zachary's bug which was: - - *) deplibs="$deplibs $depdepl" ;; + *) deplibs="$dep

Re: 1.5 release

2005-04-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Oh, I'd be happy either way. If you want to do it, fine with me, too. :) In the unlikely event that you do not upload access to ftp.gnu.org in time, please ask me. Otherwise, thanks for volunteering :) Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com

Re: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate

2005-04-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:33:25AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Two problems I want to kill with this patch: > > - picky compiler(s|flags) warn about innocuous code and thus make the > > `-c -o' and the pic_flag tests (among others) spuriously fail. > > - s

Re: fix order of -L flags added for libtool dep libs

2005-04-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ Zachary, I have Cc:ed you because this may relate to an old bugreport by you, and I would like to make a test case for it if at all possible. See [4] for the archive of this thread so far. ] * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:05:46PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Here is a p

1.5 release (was: Invalid switch passed to linker on Solaris 10 with Sun One Studio 8)

2005-04-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:11:56PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > | To the other developers: Since this is an annoying bug for many people, > | are you ok with another point release of 1.5.x? Say, weekend after > | next? If you want me to do it: how do I read

Re: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate

2005-04-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Two problems I want to kill with this patch: > - picky compiler(s|flags) warn about innocuous code and thus make the > `-c -o' and the pic_flag tests (among others) spuriously fail. > - some proprietary compilers output boilerplate every time. Same > effec

Re: tar and non-writable files in srcdir

2005-04-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > While extracting libtool-2.1a.tar.bz2 (tarball of CVS HEAD) over an > already present source tree on Solaris: > | .. > | tar: libtool-2.1a/config/ltmain.sh: Could not create file: Permission denied > | .. > | tar: libtool-2.1a/m4/ltversion.m4: Could not create

Re: tar and non-writable files in srcdir

2005-04-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:07:48AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > While extracting libtool-2.1a.tar.bz2 (tarball of CVS HEAD) over an > > already present source tree on Solaris: *snip* > > Should we avoid putting non-writeable files in the source tree because >