Hi Robert,
* Robert Ögren wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:33:54PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >>How odd! Maybe you are using a newer GNU make? Or there is something
> >>in your environment? Either way, we need to find a way to filter out
> >>the make output. :-(
> >
> >- it obviously w
Hi Greg,
* Greg Hudson wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:56:51PM CEST:
> Periodically, I face situations like this: libtool fails in some
> situation on a new operating system. The problem is already fixed
> upstream or can be fixed easily, but most of the packages I build are
> packaged with an o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| Hi Mike,
|
| * Mike Stump wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:57:59AM CEST:
|
|>How about this one... The /4 comes from the old code in ltconfig
|>that did:
|>
|>max = compute
|>headroom = m /4
|>max = max - headroom
|>
|>In the e
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
How odd! Maybe you are using a newer GNU make? Or there is something
in your environment? Either way, we need to find a way to filter out
the make output. :-(
Here's the fun:
- output appears on stdout, not stderr :)))
- it obviously works with --no-print-directory (for
more bugs in libtoolize HEAD, after -11 and -12 applied:
$ temp/libtool/b,275> pkgvdatadir=`pwd`/.. ../libtoolize --copy
libtoolize: putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `config'.
libtoolize: `config/ltmain.sh' is already up to date.
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'.
libtoo
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:01:22PM CEST:
> Hallo Ralf!
>
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>Perhaps you have out of date Makefile.in or mismatched bootstrap script?
> >
> > Obviously not. Did you use GNU make and bash?
> ] make --version
> GNU Make version 3.79, by Richard Sta
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:33:35PM CEST:
>
> Patch against HEAD -- actually against my dev branch which already has
> - --patch-11 applied, so this patch may not apply cleanly directly to
> HEAD (sans --patch-11).
>
> Okay to commit and backport to branch-2-0?
>
> F
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:28:47PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:16:33PM CET:
> >
> >>Okay to commit?
> >>
> >>Most of the hair introduced ostensibly to enable testing of
> >>uninstalled libtoolize isn'
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>Perhaps you have out of date Makefile.in or mismatched bootstrap script?
>
>
> Obviously not. Did you use GNU make and bash?
Yep:
] make --version
GNU Make version 3.79, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
Built for powerpc-apple-darwin7.0
Copyright (C
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:56:07PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > No time for looking now, but libtoolize HEAD contains
> >
> > # Massage a value for pkgvltdl_files from the value used in Makefile.am
*snip*
> I can't reproduce this:
Hehe. :)
> ] cvs -d `cat
But the problem was on my machine (I moved to gcc-3.4, and I
had rpm macros with deprecated options, so I get:
OK. Easiest workaround would be to remove these options.
I've fixed it already. I've found it after I saw that you were amazed
why I had
locking enabled. So I started to look
I am Cc:ing this to the libtool-patches list. I showed you where it is
archived, its public archive mangles email addresses, and anyway the
patch posts on savannah are crossposted there.
I have reordered your mail for convenience.
* Marcin Siennicki wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:19:55PM CEST:
12 matches
Mail list logo
