Re: AT_TESTED and (non)fatal errors

2005-03-15 Thread Noah Misch
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:30:39PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I would like to run the Autotest testsuite of Libtool HEAD on systems > which do not have all AT_TESTED() programs available, or possibly under > a different name. > > Right now, the testsuite fails when it there is at least one pr

Re: PGI and C++ templates

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Sorry for the self-reply, * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:49:00PM CET: > > This is a status update on "libtool/pgi/C++ with templates". Now here's an improved patch against branch-2-0. Should work for both static and shared uninstalled libraries plus programs linked against t

Re: version requirements

2005-03-15 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 03:45:48PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > -AC_PREREQ(2.57) > +AC_PREREQ(2.58) ## We use AS_HELP_STRING s/##/dnl/ for comments that are meaningless in configure

Re: version requirements

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:16:27PM CET: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >OK to apply (first to HEAD, second to branch-2-0)? > > This seems fine to me. Applied both. I changed both AC_PREREQ to 2.59, though, remembering that Autoconf-2.59 was me

Re: version requirements

2005-03-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply (first to HEAD, second to branch-2-0)? This seems fine to me. Bob * libltdl/configure.ac: Update version; require Autoconf >= 2.58. Index: libltdl/configure.ac === RCS file: /

FYI: revert accidental partial commit [libtool--release--2.0--patch-64]

2005-03-15 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Applied to branch-2-0. * looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--release--2.0--patch-63 to compare with * comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--release--2.0--patch-63 M bootstrap M ChangeLog * modified files Index: Changelog fr

FYI: patch to fix missing quoting

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 07:07:43PM CET: > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:12:59PM CET: > > > > This looks okay to me, can we have a test too though? > > Yes, I am working on one. First the branch-1-5 backport below. > My question would be whether anyone

version requirements

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
OK to apply (first to HEAD, second to branch-2-0)? Regards, Ralf * libltdl/configure.ac: Update version; require Autoconf >= 2.58. Index: libltdl/configure.ac === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/libltdl/configure.ac,v ret

Re: generate package.m4 correctly on fresh checkout [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-1]

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Einen wunderschönen guten Tag, Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:59:55PM CET: > Hallo Ralf, > > You wrote: > > OK to apply? > > I wrote: > > Yes please go ahead. > > You wrote: > > After you, sir! :) > > Done! ;)) Me too. Grüße, Ralf

Re: generate package.m4 correctly on fresh checkout [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-1]

2005-03-15 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, You wrote: > OK to apply? I wrote: > Yes please go ahead. You wrote: > After you, sir! :) Done! ;)) Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/

Re: generate package.m4 correctly on fresh checkout [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-1]

2005-03-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:20:23PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > OK to apply? > > > > * bootstrap: Allow to override tools. > > Yes please go ahead. After you, sir! :) (I wouldn't mind applying patches from other developers if asked to do so, but not without thei