On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:32:05PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
>
> I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
> running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
> stamp-vcl .. seems like timestam
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This one took me long. :(
OK to apply (HEAD only)?
And, BTW: I am sorry I spam so much. I will stop after this one and
start applying soon (not today).
Looks good!
Bob
Regards,
Ralf
* bootstrap: really remove bogus files Makefile tests/Makefile.
This one took me long. :(
OK to apply (HEAD only)?
And, BTW: I am sorry I spam so much. I will stop after this one and
start applying soon (not today).
Regards,
Ralf
* bootstrap: really remove bogus files Makefile tests/Makefile.
Index: bootstrap
==
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
stamp-vcl .. seems like timestamp files don't work with it at al
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> However, I think this patch below should be checked in (HEAD,
> branch-2-0). OK?
Agreed.
> --- configure.ac 12 Dec 2004 16:24:28 - 1.62
> +++ configure.ac 11 Mar 2005 16:35:44 -
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
> AC_SUBST([M4SH], ['$(AUTOM4TE) --language=m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay to commit?
* libtoolize.m4sh (func_massage_pkgvmacro_DATA): New function
to calculate the macro filenames to be copied by libtoolize.
* Makefile.am (edit): Substitute pkgvmacro_DATA.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMA
I don't know if it's worthwhile to support FreeBSD make..
I have no idea how to keep it from looping without this patch, after
running the rules for vcl-tmp it always seems to want to update
stamp-vcl .. seems like timestamp files don't work with it at all.
(No, I don't want _this_ patch applied.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay to commit?
* bootstrap: Need to generate tests/package.m4 from Makefile.am
before generating tests/testsuite from tests/Makefile.am, or
else bootstrap of a fresh checkout fails.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PR
[}KW~®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTEC
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Don't we also want to ignore errors from clean rules?
> -test -f $(srcdir)/$(TESTSUITE) && \
> $(SHELL) $(srcdir)/$(TESTSUITE) --clean
>
> I could not find a definite answer in the GCS or Automake docs (it's
> used in an example there), but I
Sorry for the crosspost.
I would like to run the Autotest testsuite of Libtool HEAD on systems
which do not have all AT_TESTED() programs available, or possibly under
a different name.
Right now, the testsuite fails when it there is at least one program
missing which is necessary for one test, ev
Hallo Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Now, does that mean there was never a problem w.r.t. `&&' vs. `;'?
Yes, I think it means that ; vs && was a red herring.
> I don't believe they can get by without auto*. But I'd be happy to be
> proven wrong. (I'd demand a test for this, though, so that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-65 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-65
M tests/Makefile.am
M ChangeLog
* modified files
Index: Changelog
from R
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:05:09PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > | ( cd ../../libltdl && /bin/sh
> > "/mount/endor/wildenhu/download/software/libtool/write/libtool/config"/missing
> > --run tar chf - COPYING.LIB README Makefile.am Makefile.in configure.ac
Hallo Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> | ( cd ../../libltdl && /bin/sh
> "/mount/endor/wildenhu/download/software/libtool/write/libtool/config"/missing
> --run tar chf - COPYING.LIB README Makefile.am Makefile.in configure.ac
> configure ltdl.c ltdl.h lt_error.c libltdl/lt_error.h
> libltdl
Hi Gary,
You beat me to it. :)
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:40:23PM CET:
>
> from Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (tiny change)
>
> * tests/Makefile (clean-local): Only run the testsuite cleanup
> if the testsuite has been generated.
>
> --- orig
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:02:53PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:58:58PM CET:
> >
> >>Applied to branch-2-0 (I didn't make this oversight in the other branches).
> >>
> >> from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-64 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-64
M tests/Makefile.am
M ChangeLog
* modified files
Index: Changelog
from P
Hi Per,
Per Bothner wrote:
> 'make clean' fails if there is no tests/testsuite directory.
> (This is cvs libtool.)
> I have an attached a patch for Makefile, but unfortunately
> the 'clean-local' rule comes from automake (1.9.3, in my case)
Not so, it comes from a regular rule in tests/Makefile.a
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf!
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:58:58PM CET:
>
>>Applied to branch-2-0 (I didn't make this oversight in the other branches).
>>
>> from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> * libltdl/Makefile.am (install-data-local): Us
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:58:58PM CET:
>
> Applied to branch-2-0 (I didn't make this oversight in the other branches).
>
> from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * libltdl/Makefile.am (install-data-local): Use `&&' to separate
> commands so t
21 matches
Mail list logo
