Re: Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread D . Walsh
On Mar 07, 2005, at 19:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote: D.Walsh wrote: Peter, are you trying to tell me that the "libtool" supplied and installed in Mac OSX is not the "GNU libtool"? Yes, I am, in a way. Apple ships GNU libtool as /usr/bin/glibtool, and has a completely different program as /usr/bin/lib

Re: Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
D.Walsh wrote: Peter, are you trying to tell me that the "libtool" supplied and installed in Mac OSX is not the "GNU libtool"? Yes, I am, in a way. Apple ships GNU libtool as /usr/bin/glibtool, and has a completely different program as /usr/bin/libtool. Let me demonstrate: peter% /usr/bin/libtoo

Re: Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread D . Walsh
On Mar 07, 2005, at 17:42, Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 D.Walsh wrote: | Any luck with generating a patch that allows libtool to work properly in | the Macintosh environment or has this ball been dropped already? | GNU Libtool does work properly in the Mac O

Re: Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 D.Walsh wrote: | Any luck with generating a patch that allows libtool to work properly in | the Macintosh environment or has this ball been dropped already? | GNU Libtool does work properly in the Mac OS X environment. The fact that you installed in /us

Re: Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, D.Walsh wrote: Any luck with generating a patch that allows libtool to work properly in the Macintosh environment or has this ball been dropped already? Please resend your patch. Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesyst

Mac OSX

2005-03-07 Thread D . Walsh
Any luck with generating a patch that allows libtool to work properly in the Macintosh environment or has this ball been dropped already? -- Dale

Re: patch to fix missing quoting

2005-03-07 Thread Per Bothner
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Thanks for reporting this. Your patch is not quite correct, as it causes the $ in the libobj name to be quoted twice. Thus, the output name of the .lo file will be wrong. Hm. Yes. Before delving into a better patch: Beware that such file names do not play too well with oth

Re: patch to fix missing quoting

2005-03-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Per, * Per Bothner wrote on Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:02:20AM CET: > The srcname and the target name were not being quoted. > This caused problems with Java, where .class files may > commonly contain '$'. Thanks for reporting this. Your patch is not quite correct, as it causes the $ in the libo