Re: 124-gary-eliminate-libdlloader.patch

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Okay to commit? Yes, PLEASE!!! Thank you! Thank you! :-) Bob == Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

124-gary-eliminate-libdlloader.patch

Okay to commit? -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook Index: ChangeLog from Gary V. Vaughan <[EM

FYI: 123-gary-split-line-for-quote-test.patch

...otherwise quote.test generates a spurious fairure. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook Index:

FYI: 122-gary-no-_LT_AC_TAGVAR-outside-1-5.patch

Typos fixed. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook Index: ChangeLog from Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL

Re: --whole-archive with pgcc

Hallo Peter, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >>> Index: ChangeLog >>> 2005-02-24 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS): The Portland group's >>> compiler does not pass --whole-archive. Move gnu ld ch

Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*

>> cc_basename=`$echo X"$compiler" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%;s%[ ].*$%%'` Make that: cc_basename=`$echo X"$compiler" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%;s%[ ]*.*$%%'` Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU

Re: --whole-archive with pgcc

Gary V. Vaughan wrote: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00039.html Thanks, I looked at my list mail and did not find this :( On HEAD, when you merge, I'd like to continue to use -rpath for GNU ld though. Thanks for the heads up. And apologies for the crappy ChangeLog e

Re: --whole-archive with pgcc

Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Peter! Peter O'Gorman wrote: Index: ChangeLog 2005-02-24 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS): The Portland group's compiler does not pass --whole-archive. Move gnu ld check for the flag to the top so it can be overridden. (AC

Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*

Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Doesn't it make most sense to fix cc_basename so that it doesn't include any trailing cruft? Then the switch would not need to be changed. The wildcard might match a command name which differs by later characters. My thoughts exactly. cc_basename is only ever used in case

Re: --whole-archive with pgcc

Hi Peter! Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Index: ChangeLog > 2005-02-24 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS): The Portland group's > compiler does not pass --whole-archive. Move gnu ld check for > the flag to the top so it can be overridden

Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*

Hi Peter! Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> Okay to apply to branch-1-5 and then forward port? > > Doesn't it make most sense to fix cc_basename so that it doesn't include > any trailing cruft? Then the switch would not need to be changed. The > wildcard