-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Egger wrote:
| The patch fixes the issues.
|
| ltmain_stable.m4sh.diff - patch against latest branch-2-0
| ltmain_head.m4sh.diff- patch against cvs head
Committed, thanks.
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGIN PGP SI
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
If by ugly, you are referring to 2 forked tars per file copy, I did
it this way to minimise code churn on branch-2-0. I agree that it
would be sensible to rewrite the func_copy_* functions to collect a
filtered list of filenames, and then copy them all in on serial operation
*blush*
Applied on HEAD before merging to branch-2-0.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.re
Do you want a inexpensive Perscriptions?
http://sfnwlu.nrik.com
Hi Peter!
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> | Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
> |
> | If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
> |
>
> Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.
Okay, thanks! It appears to be doing the right thing he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
| Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
|
| If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
|
Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGI
Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0?
If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/li
