Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems]

2002-02-28 Thread Tom Lord
espie: [...] I'm only tweaking libtool VERY reluctantly. This thing is at least one harder of magnitude LESS maintainable than a Makefile, and probably more. This partly comes from the fact that it is impossible to debug shell scripts of such a size. This also

Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a]

2002-11-14 Thread Tom Lord
> Let them install BASH and get out of our way. As someone else pointed out, bash uses autoconf. Also, while its good to talk about bringing up GNU environments on top of proprietary ones, the long term view is to also think about bringing them up on raw iron. So, pick a small set of pr

Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts inincluded.a]

2002-11-15 Thread Tom Lord
> I don't see the urgency to move to shell functions, but I do > see how they can simplify our lives. Uh... "if not now, when"? Seriously, there's _always_ commercial incentive to do a half assed job and the _real_ ego competition is to reject that incentive and do a good jo