On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:25:36AM +0200, Patrick Guio wrote:
> If I just "touch configure" then everything is running ok again. I am not
> sure which of the package is generating this trouble nut is there any
> policy/strategy of using configuration tool together with a cvs
> repository?
that's
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:23:34PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> In my opinion it is prohibitive and stupid not to have a libtool release
> that can properly interact with autoconf.
It's equally stupid to release a version of autoconf which cannot properly
interact with released versions of li
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:09:09PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> In my experience almost all problems that occur while moving to autoconf
> 2.5x are outright bugs in the configure.in/aclocal.m4 scripts.
We've already discussed this before, and I decided not to rely upon your opinion
--
Thomas
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:15:07PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> |> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:09:09PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> |> > In my experience almost all problems that occur while moving to autoconf
> |>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 08:25:00PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> The Autoconf team is happy to annonce the first beta of forthcoming
> Autoconf 2.55. Download, compile, install, torture, and enjoy!
...
> ** Bug Fixes
>
> - Portability of the Autoconf package to Solaris.
if it couldn't work pr
