Hello,
The libtool manual suggests strongly that one not use it
for C++ libraries.
Is this section of the document up-to-date with the stable
release of libtool? CVS libtool?
from libtool manual -
11.1 Writing libraries for C++
Creating libraries
Hello,
I realize that libtool was made to fit well with automake
& autoconf. Has anyone had experience using it with a
project that uses Jam?
I ask because I'm packaging the Boost libraries (www.boost.org)
for Debian, and I'd like to use libtool to make the shared libs,
rather than fiddle wit
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:48:04PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> > It is NOT up-to-date for CVS HEAD and alpha versions of Libtool.
>
> I recall that this documentation was updated in the muti-lingual
> branch. Perhaps it was not merged over as it
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:16:24PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I'm converting a project to libtool, and need to maintain the existing
> SONAME and library names. I can't find a FAQ to see if there's a good
> way to do this.
I think the answer is "no, there's no good way to do this".
This is m
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 08:50:23AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins writes:
> > then you can just reverse-engineer
> > the computation that libtool does. Then choose values for Current,
> > Revision, and Age that give you the answer you want.
>
&
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:34:33PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > This change was a long time coming, so many people have complained
> > about having libx.so.1 under Solars/Linux and having libx.so.2 under IRIX.
> > Adding 1 to the version isn't necessary, I've looked everywhere I could
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:25:49AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Thomas Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > if linux's behaviour is really extraordinary or if systems
> > with such limited library features are slowly dying away?
>
> Making just one pass across a -lfoo library at its point in th
