linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

2005-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Can someone explain to me what the rationale was for rejecting this patch, so that I can address those reasons? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

2005-07-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi again, Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last week, or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the list? :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:07:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Last Ma

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

2005-08-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:01:35PM CEST: > > Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last > > week, > I've been away, sorry for the late response. Ok,