On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:00:29PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What about using symbol version map?
> Say:
>
> MYPLUGIN {
> global:
> init_plugin; what__C9exception; ...
Incidentally, version maps do support
extern "C++" {
some_class::function
other_class::*
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:43:43PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Another possibility that occurred to me, that would further alleviate
> the problem of duplicate shared libraries, would be to get GCC to no
> longer issue the `-lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s' sequence, but instead, to use
> just `-lgcc_s -lc
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:35:39PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> More specifically, and static libc that uses __divdi3, since a shared
> one would have its own __divdi3, no?
In theory. But I wouldn't expect static libc to have a different
set of symbols than shared libc. *shrug*
> However, I
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 06:18:19AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> * gcc.c (LIBGCC_SPEC): Folded %L and duplicate %G here...
> (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): ... from here.
> (init_gcc_specs): Duplicate it here too, omitting
> shared_name in the second copy.
> (init_spec): Tes
