Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 29, 2000, Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a bug in gcc at least til 2.8.1 (no 2.95 here at the > > moment): > > > _IO_do_write0x8c > > /opt/GCC281/lib/libstdc++. > > a(stdiostream.o) > > Not a bug. It's just that libs

Link static library into libtool library

On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following: > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool objects: /usr/local/lib/libbar.a and yet the Solari

Re: Link static library into libtool library

Thomas Tanner wrote: > Yep. That's already implemented in CVS libtool: Just a minor question ... does CVS libtool require CVS autoconf and/or CVS automake? -- Thanks, Paul

Re: Why does libtool silently remove -l libs from the link line?

Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jul 26, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why is it a warning? This should be an error. If I tell it > > "use -lgdi32" it should use it or error out. > > Nope. -lgdi32 is being recorded as a required dependency, and it will > be linked in when any executa

Re: Why does libtool silently remove -l libs from the link line?

Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Aug 10, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> On Jul 26, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Why is it a warning? This should be an error. If I tell it >

HP-UX and +s

The ChangeLog contains the following entry: 1999-04-25 Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... * ltconfig.in (hpux*, hardcode_minus_L): Set to yes. (hpux*, hardcode_libdir_flag_spec): Do not use +s by default. (hpux*, shlibpath_overrides_runpath): Set to no.

Re: HP-UX and +s

foo foo_LDFLAGS = -L$(libdir) -lbar -- Regards, Paul Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Oct 26, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (hpux*, hardcode_libdir_flag_spec): Do not use +s by default. > > > What was the rational for this? > > It&#x

Re: HP-UX and +s

settings the way I need it, but libtool.m4 won't allow such a configuration. Are these settings inconsistent with each other? hardcode_action=relink hardcode_direct=no hardcode_minus_L=yes -- Thanks, Paul Paul Berrevoets wrote: > I've tried this now, but unfortunately

[Patch] Use of expr subexpressions in ltmain.in

, but we have since installed a patch which causes expr to return '' on subexpression match failure. -- Regards, Paul 2000-11-16 Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * ltmain.in: Check for '' and '0' when using expr subexpressions. --- ltmai

[Patch] Insufficient quoting in cygwin support code

re being expanded by m4 into '0', '' and '' respectively. '[$]#', '[$]2' and '[$]3' should be used instead. The patch is attached. -- Regards, Paul Berrevoets 2000-11-18 Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libtool