Re: libtool versioning

Jef Driesen - Mon, 03 May 2010 20:24:09 +0200 >On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> Hello Jef, >> >> * Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST: >>> On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote: >> The git master version of Libtoo

Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-in Libtool replacement which cuts build times in half

Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:34:18 -0700 >Thus, I wrote Dolt, a drop-in replacement for libtool's compilation >mode. Excellent, impressive :))) ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:43:07 +0200 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:03:29PM CEST: >> >> Referring to GNU Automake manual §8.1.2, I'm using the _LDADD >> variable in my Makfile.am to lin

libtool optimization

Hello, I've noted that libtool is very very slow. By default it produces shell snippets with "/bin/bash". I tried this in configure.ac: is this the good way ? export SHELL=/bin/sh # Include all that's required to build a library AC_PROG_LIBTOOL Cheers, Michel

Re: libtool optimization

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:04:29 +0200 >Hi Michel, Bob, > >* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:26:58PM CEST: >> >> Current libtool still uses the shell that Autoconf chooses for it. >> However, if you have a faster shell which actually works (e.g. d

Re: libtool optimization

Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:32:23 -0500 (CDT) >On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Michel Briand wrote: >> >> Honestly I wanted to do two optimizations. >> >> Firstly, I've tested /bin/dash and seen that it's much faster >> than /

Re: libtool optimization

Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:35:26 -0500 (CDT) >On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Michel Briand wrote: >> You don't see my point. In autogen I want to have a way to select a >> different shell (for configure & libtool). I'm not saying that I

libtool error in install

Hi, I got this strange error, building cinelerra, on Ubuntu 8.10, with libtool 2.2.4 : make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire « /home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/quicktime » /bin/bash ../mkinstalldirs /home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/debian/tmp/usr/lib /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=insta

Re: libtool error in install

Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:15:15 +0100 >Hi, > >I got this strange error, building cinelerra, >on Ubuntu 8.10, with libtool 2.2.4 : > >make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire « >/home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/quicktime » >/bin/bash .

Re: just how much autotools got faster, or: just forget about dolt

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:51:53 +0100 >For all dolt junkies, and whoever claims autotools and esp. libtool >are performance hogs: yes, they are still not the fastest thing in >the world. But we are getting better: > WOW! Great performances ;) >As an example, I b

Re: stop libtool from compiling everything twice

herman bastiaens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:50:44 + > > >> * Bernd Jendrissek wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:32:08PM CET: >> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:52 PM, herman bastiaens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > > is there a way to stop libtool from compiling everything tw

Re: tips for checking changes to library version numbers?

Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:34:45 + >Hello, > >Does anyone have any good ways to check that updates to -version-info >numbers accurately reflect the actual changes in the API of a library >when making a new release? > >Currently I do this by (1) comparing 'nm' output

Re: tips for checking changes to library version numbers?

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:27:33 +0100 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:19:29AM CET: >> Brian Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:34:45 + >> > >> >Does anyone have any goo

Where to generate .lo files ?

Hi all, I wonder if it's possible to tell libtool to generate .lo file elsewhere than in source directory (where Makefile resides). Best regards, Michel -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to

Fw: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem

:14:40 -0500 De: "Ian Stakenvicius, Aerobiology Research" À: Michel Briand Cc: "John A. Stewart" Sujet: Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem To elaborate further: From my research, rpath is absolutely required to use libtool, and rpath is supposed to be set to the final

Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem

l. See the libtool documentation for more information. Any idea ? Michel Ralf Wildenhues - Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:28:17 +0100 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:41:42PM CET: >> plugin_LTLIBRARIES = libFreeWRLplugin.la >> plugindir=$(PLUGIN_DIR)

Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem

directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0/src' make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0/src' make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0' make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0'

Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem

Ralf Wildenhues - Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:39:16 +0100 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:34:41PM CET: >> > >> >I've a grave problem : when I build my Debian package the libtool >> >install mode was not called. In the resultin

Damien Lespiau » shave: making the autotools output sane

http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/2009/02/18/shave-making-the-autotools-output-sane/ ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Damien Lespiau » shave: making the autotools output sane

Adam Mercer - Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:33:35 -0500 >On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 00:25, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> Is it possible to add AM_SILENT_RULES only when automake version is >= 1.11, >> that is is there a good way to retrieve the version of automake in >> configure.ac ? Something like: >> >> AM_IN

Re: libtool versioning and ABI

Joseph Garvin - Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:02:18 -0500 >On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Joseph Garvin >> wrote: >> > I read a description of libtool's versioning here: >> > >> > >> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updating-versi

Re: libtool versioning and ABI

Ralf Wildenhues - Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:34:09 +0200 >Hello Michel, > >* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:46:00AM CEST: >> Personally I've always seen interface as a contract. >> A contract between a library writer and library user. > >Yes. > &g

Re: libtool versioning and ABI

Charles Wilson - Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:50:33 -0400 >Michel Briand wrote: >> This last variable is crafted > >"crafted"? This is your mistake. > >> to reflect the usual versioning. I.e. if >> I want the version to 1.22.5, > >Why? Why do you CARE what

Re: libtool versioning and ABI

The whole story is that I never wanted to use libtool in the first place. And, now, I know why :). ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: libtool versioning and ABI

Sorry for my last post : too quick answer :)) Charles Wilson - Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:45:58 -0400 >Michel Briand wrote: > >> Thank you, but, sorry, I'm not convinced. Remember what I said a >> few mails ago: that's all of interface contract = same concept as >> y