Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable], yet might not be an immediate drop in replacement for version 2.2.10

2010-09-25 Thread Kyle Sallee
I wondered the same as did Alon. Also I noticed that httpd version 2.2.16 failed compilation with libtool version 2.4 installed Compile log looks like: found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation... buildconf

Fwd: curious...

2006-10-20 Thread Kyle Sallee
approval. Therefore, I am resending the email now that I have confirmed joining. -- Forwarded message -- From: Kyle Sallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 20, 2006 2:21 PM Subject: curious... To: libtool@gnu.org I was looking at a 26M sh -x trace of an invocation of libtool

Re: Fwd: curious...

2006-10-21 Thread Kyle Sallee
ould be subject to change, and every one of those loops that contain case statements, and so forth... I am guessing that it would be a signifigant amount of change? On 10/21/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Kyle, * Kyle Sallee wrote on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:48:24AM CES

Re: fork costs...

2006-10-21 Thread Kyle Sallee
Comments made inline... On 10/21/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well. In fact I have a working patch on my disk to separate link mode in another scriptlet libtool-link. It speeds up script execution on my GNU/Linux by about 20%. I can post it if people desire, but I'm agains

Re: libtool optimization

2008-10-25 Thread Kyle Sallee
I recently tested dash for other purposes than libtool. A statically linked dash shell can be started repeatedly to execute a tiny scripts that contain only shell syntax at the amazing rate of 6 times what can be accomplished with a dynamically linked bash. However, when executing a script of small

Re: libtool optimization

2008-10-25 Thread Kyle Sallee
/~parkw/#bashdiff On the other hand libtool would probably not require new shell script functionality for interfacing with database, gtk+, and a built in web server. On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Kyle Sal

Re: libtool optimization

2008-10-26 Thread Kyle Sallee
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > first off, please do not top-post. Thank you. top-posting? Had no idea what that was at first. You prefer that retorts follow quotes. No problem. > And there is little point in > complaining about 1.5.x speed without

Re: removal of .la files from Debian and a possible solution to the libtool shared libs problem

2009-09-01 Thread Kyle Sallee
libxcb version 1.0 installed: /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.la /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0 However, libxcb version 1.4 did not install the above mentioned files. libX11 version 1.1.3 linked using /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.la. All software linked with libX11