I tried running "make check" for libtool-1.4.2 under ia64
Linux (glibc-2.2.4) and got "14 of 83 tests failed". I
include the results below. For comparison under i386 Linux
I got "6 of 59 tests failed". If someone wants more details,
please just ask.
Jens
PASS: cdemo-static.test
PASS: cdemo-m
Hello,
It is my understanding that relinking is not needed on elf
or Linux binary platforms. Further relinking actually gets
in the way when making binary packages, since "make install"
is usually installing into a buildroot.
What is the best way to go about fixing this? Some pointers
would be
Could something be done about all the spam coming to the
libtool lists? It's particularly bad on libtool-patches.
Perhaps that list list should be made postable to
subscribers only?
Jens
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/m
Hello,
It is a well known problem with libtool (at least in the
packaging business!) that relinking breaks things when
packages are make install'ed in a buildroot rather than in
the final runtime destination. There seem to be various
workarounds and fixes available, but it seems it would be
much
Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Question: what's the status, is it a good plan to
> create patches for the libtool-1-4 branch (to be
> 1.4.4) ?
I dunno, but my understanding is that the 1.4 branch is
basically closed and that patches are only be accepted for
1.5 currently.
Jens
___
[moved from libtool-patches to libtool]
Albert, Thank you for looking at the patch, and sorry for taking
too long to follow up to your comments. (please see below)
> Index: libtool.m4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/m4/li
>>>>> "SJR" == Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SJR> 2004-04-05 at 14:12, Jens Petersen wrote:
>> Is the revised patch below any better?
>>
SJR> This patch is still RedHat/Fedora specific with no
SJR> c
