Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying to fix. I got: # /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ia64-

Re: [PATCH]: A new one for ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:50:34 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It was my mistake. It works. Here is a new patch for ld/Makefile.am. Any objections? 2000-03-09 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile.am (stmp-run-ld): New target. (all-am): Depen

[ian@zembu.com: Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am]

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 10 Mar 2000 13:22:19 -0800 From: Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 23:10:39 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800 |>From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> |>I know t

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:52:32 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> Executing a shell script does use a bit more memory, but only just |> enough for "/bin/sh" and the name of the script to execute. If that |> is pushing H.J. over the memory limit, then he must have b

Re: State of win32 dll support in libtool at CVS

2000-03-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:29:46 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Shared DLLs Building:require special support doesn't require special support (namely, building with PIC) (are built from the same

Re: Can't build with cc on Solaris

2000-04-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
From: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Apr 2000 02:35:33 -0300 binutils top-level configure passes --with-gnu-ld down to sub-projects `configure' commands whenever it finds `ld' is going to be built. I think that is a bug. If you are doing a one-tree build with the binut

Re: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases

2000-05-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated, 19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when officia