to be ok. The file size should be 1184578 bytes.
//David Olofson --- Programmer, Reologica Instruments AB
.- M A I A -.
| Multimedia Application Integration Architecture |
| A Free/Open Source Plugin API for Professional M
DL_AddTimer
[ 1] SDL_AllocRW
[ 2] SDL_AudioDriverName
[ 3] SDL_AudioInit
[ 4] SDL_AudioQuit
[ 5] SDL_BuildAudioCVT
...
Has anyone tried hacking a script to turn that into a .def file? Or
should I, or someone else, just try to add a feature to objdump?
//Da
, we're talking about something that's *really* broken, inconcistent
(any one else cares about HOST_CC...?), and a major PITA for a great
number of users. (I might be the first, but even the established
workarounds failed on my setup...)
And now I'm not even
with trickier stuff must upgrade their binutils to a
> recent version. How does that sound?
That could work. Dunno' about the reliability or portability of fitering
'objdump -p' output, but if it works for most people for now, it can at
least avoid strictly forcing every cross
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 11:08, David Olofson wrote:
[...]
> Indeed, it seems that the export section is *not* really a symbol
> table, which is why some DLLs can have symbols ('-syms'), while most
> DLLs don't. (In fact, I think clean DLLs *shouldn't* have th
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 11:46, Danny Smith wrote:
> --- David Olofson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 17
>
> September 2002 20:33, Guido Draheim wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > On another e-mail, you said to have some idea of the `objdump -p`
>
pgen.c...?
>
> It is an issue with impgen. Try:
> % impgen c:/winnt/system32/user32.dll
>
> All the names should have stdcall decoration, but don't.
Ok... Is that information at all available in a DLL, or does that mean we
either have to make assumptions, or just *require*
uot; which will produce a library like libwhatever.so.0.0.3.
>
> Don't know why it was done this way but there must have been a good
> reason.
AFAIK, the idea is that the version info used during build should be
usable as a way of matching applications with a *range* of library
v
ea for other reasons.
Would be nice if it could be made to work somehow, but I probably won't
make use of that feature myself.
//David Olofson --- Programmer, Reologica Instruments AB
.- Coming soon from VaporWare Inc....
| The Return of Audi
On Friday 20 September 2002 22:31, Guido Draheim wrote:
> David Olofson wrote:
[...]
> > How about building import libs from headers? (You need the headers to
> > compile anyway...)
>
> Ahhm, not quite - some functions are exported only on a case-by-case
> basis,
On Monday 23 September 2002 13:00, David Olofson wrote:
> On Friday 20 September 2002 22:31, Guido Draheim wrote:
[...]
> > In
> > fact, we have a set of function names for a given lib - in its
> > symbol table.
>
> In an export table, I would say, as most clean Win32
On Monday 23 September 2002 15:30, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> David Olofson wrote:
> > However, it's still a very bad idea to compile tools as part of the
> > application build process. ;-)
>
> Right, if you want to install implib as part of distributable resource
> when
12 matches
Mail list logo
