f hook to remove unwanted installs (ick).
Or is there a simpler (yet still portable) way to do what I want?
Thanks in advance.
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Nets
> On Thu, July 26, 2007 01:20, David Fang wrote:
> > I wasn't able to find an answer for this in the libtool/automake
> > manuals: Is there a way to force libtool (with automake) to create the
> > shared version of an uninstalled library? I would like to use libtool
nonexistent 'mkinstalldirs' and the top-level
dist/distcheck seems happy.
Is this a sin I'm going to pay for?
Thanks in advance.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~f
I am not going to release 1.5.26 for this though :)
Not critical for sure, but perhaps worth noting somewhere in the docs?
That libltdl's build support files are generated with version X, but the
above steps can be done to regenerate with version Y. I can see this
being applicable to
with more concrete details if I haven't been clear enough.
Thanks in advance.
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
___
> > I'm having a problem testing some libtool (ltdl) modules, but only
> > on OS X (darwin7 and darwin8, libtool 1.5.22 and .24). My executable
> > lt_dlopens a .la library in another built directory (during make check
> > testing), and fails with an lt_dlerror message like:
> >
> > dlopen(../
> > It is entirely possible that you've found a bug, Mac OS X should work
> > the same as linux et.al. in this regard. Does the module itself have any
> > dependencies that possibly are not being found (check with otool -L
> > mymodule.0.so)? If that is not the case, please send more info (if you
>
> > > It is entirely possible that you've found a bug, Mac OS X should work
> > > the same as linux et.al. in this regard. Does the module itself have any
> > > dependencies that possibly are not being found (check with otool -L
> > > mymodule.0.so)? If that is not the case, please send more info (
Hi,
Must've missed this message earlier...
> > The executable takes command-line arguments that call lt_dladdsearchpath
> > (option -L) and lt_dlopenext (option -l). The file, ../../lib/mymodule.la
> > has already been built at the time of testing. The executable is invoked
> > with "-L.
tion outside of main, i.e.
one thrown and uncaught during statics.
I'm not sure a C++ plug-in would work in C, but if you had a function for
cleaning up resources (something likely to appear in a dtor), you could
register a cleanup function with atexit().
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems La
=2 -C
% make && make -k check
...
All 124 tests passed
and
63 tests behaved as expected.
1 test was skipped.
(skipped #55: template test with subdirs)
Looking forward to using 2.2!
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornel
) use libltdl in C++ projects. Sure, the header forces symbols to
have C-linkage in any case, but I'd sleep better knowing this was covered
somehow.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
___
http://lists.gnu.o
12 matches
Mail list logo
